Consumer Complaint Won Against Defective Product Services

Consumer Complaint Won Against Defective Product Services

Consumer disputes in India are increasing rapidly due to the rising number of defective products, misleading advertisements, and poor after-sales service. In this case, our client purchased a high-value product from a well-known company, expecting reliable performance and proper support. However, the product started malfunctioning within a short period, and despite repeated requests, the company failed to provide repairs, replacement, or refund.

After months of frustration, our client approached us to pursue the matter legally. We evaluated the facts, assessed the documents, and advised filing a complaint before the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. Our primary objective was to demonstrate the defect, the negligence of the service provider, and the financial as well as mental suffering caused to the client.

We collected evidence, prepared a solid complaint, and argued the matter citing relevant consumer laws and precedents. The Commission accepted our arguments and passed a favourable order directing the seller/company to refund the product amount, pay compensation, and cover legal costs.

This case highlights how consumer laws protect individuals against unfair trade practices and how proper legal guidance can help victims of defective products receive justice.

Our Study Process for this Case

This case involved multiple legal and factual challenges:

1. Defective Product Without Proper Technical Reports

Although the product was malfunctioning, the company refused to acknowledge the defect. We had to gather independent proof to establish the defect convincingly.

2. Repeated Denial of After-Sales Service

The service provider kept delaying repair requests, issuing vague responses, and avoiding responsibility, creating difficulty in establishing negligence.

3. Mental Agony & Financial Loss

The client suffered repeated inconvenience, loss of time, and emotional stress, all of which needed to be pointed out legally.

4. Lack of Transparency by the Company

The company tried to shift blame onto the customer and deny any compensation, forcing us to expose contradictions and service lapses.

5. Need to Prove Unfair Trade Practice

Consumer courts require clear evidence showing:

  • product defect

  • deficiency in service

  • failure to resolve complaint despite multiple attempts

  • impact on the consumer’s daily life

Each of these elements had to be demonstrated through structured documentation.

Our legal team developed a comprehensive strategy to ensure justice for the client:

1. Detailed Documentation Collection

We compiled all the necessary records, including:

  • Purchase invoice and warranty card

  • Photographs and videos showing product defects

  • Emails, messages, and call logs proving service denial

  • Complaint numbers raised with customer support

These documents established a clear chain of events.

2. Drafting a Strong Consumer Complaint

We filed the complaint under the Consumer Protection Act, highlighting:

  • manufacturing defect

  • poor service response

  • negligence

  • financial and emotional loss

  • unfair trade practice

3. Presenting Independent Technical Evidence

Where needed, we obtained a third-party technical assessment report confirming the product’s defect, strengthening our case substantially.

4. Effective Court Representation

During hearings, we demonstrated:

  • the company’s failure to repair or replace

  • repeated avoidance of responsibility

  • violation of consumer rights

  • the mental agony suffered by the client

We also countered the company’s attempts to blame the client.

5. Using Precedents & Consumer Law Principles

We cited judgments where courts ruled in favour of consumers facing similar issues, reinforcing the client’s position.

The final decision was entirely in favour of our client:

  • Full refund of the product price was ordered

  • Compensation granted for mental agony and inconvenience

  • Litigation costs awarded, ensuring the client incurred no loss

  • The company was directed to improve service practices

  • The defect and negligence were officially acknowledged

  • The client received closure, justice, and financial recovery

The case stands as a powerful reminder that consumers in India are fully protected under the law, and companies cannot escape responsibility for selling defective products or providing poor service.

Our Case Success Stories

We Are Providing Top Services With Excellent Performance